2026 · Evidence audit

Finalto — institutional liquidity provider

Finalto Financial Services Limited is regulated by the FCA, CySEC, ASIC, and BVI FSC. The firm operates in major financial centers, including New York, London, and Singapore. Self-measured claims regarding connectivity and latency lack disclosed metrics for verification.

Finalto Financial Services Limited · not verified · last re-checked 2026-09 · evidence score 91/100

Licence, read on the register

Regulator	Licence number	Jurisdiction	Tier	Source
FCA	481853	UK	tier-1	open source ↗
CySEC	264/15	Cyprus	tier-2	open source ↗
ASIC	424008	Australia	tier-1	open source ↗
MAS	not verified	Singapore	tier-1	open source ↗
BVI FSC	SIBA/L/14/1067	British Virgin Islands	tier-3	open source ↗

Tier classification follows the same scale as the retail register: tier-1 = FCA/ASIC/CFTC-class supervision, tier-2 = CySEC/FSC-Mauritius/MFSA-class, tier-3 = offshore registration. A tier-2 licence is genuine supervision without an investor compensation scheme — never misread it as tier-1 protection.

What the firm commits to

Claims specific enough to be falsified — and the ones that remain the venue's own measurement.

Testable claims

Finalto Financial Services Limited is regulated by the FCA (UK) under licence number 481853 — own about-us page
Finalto EU Ltd is regulated by CySEC under licence 264/15 (company HE332334, Nicosia) — own about-us page
Finalto (Australia) Pty Ltd is ASIC-licensed under licence no. 424008 (ACN 158 641 064) — own about-us page
Three data centres: New York, London and Singapore (own liquidity page)

Claims we cannot verify from outside

"Direct Tier-1 bank connectivity" and "ultra-low latency" — own liquidity-page marketing without disclosed metrics

Perimeter and coverage

Asset classes	Venues	Connectivity	Clients accepted	Explicitly refused
FX, CFDs, Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Indices	New York, London, Singapore	FIX API	Brokers, Hedge funds, Institutional clients

A firm that publishes its own negative space — who it refuses, where it is not licensed — is materially easier to diligence than one that doesn't. The refusal list is treated here as a disclosure, not a defect.